As an overview of the items:
CBR begins with a goal and then backtracks into the methodology of the lesson. Essentially a map principle. If one knows where one is going, one can set the appropriate steps in reaching said goal. This with a twist though. For the student, other paths must be laid out that through trial and error, the students can devise the best path to completion. It reminds me a lot of the "Choose your own Adventure" series of books. You could take many different paths, but only a few work out to the logical and fruitful end.
Learning goals
The Mission
The Cover Story
The Role
The scenario operations
The Resources
The Feedback
(Hsu)
Week 9 brought us Anchored Instruction and the iconic model of the Jasper Series. The essence of this contends that individualized skills are totally meaningless unless learned in "context." Anchored instruction allows for this authentic learning in context, macro to micro contexts allowing for right size chunking of the material. The greatest this is the ability of the instruction to lend itself to higher level functioning. The students learn in part, then allowed to expand their learning through variations of different scenarios...all based on the original problems. Depth, not breadth. And all of this guided by storytellers, not teachers.
The problems taken from the readings exhaust the kids. As much as they like this new thought process, it is very mentally taxing and the duration seems a bit limited of nature.
The good...the more the kids become involved in anchored instruction, the better the quality (give and take) of learning takes place.
Seems similar to MOST from week 11. Immediate immersion into the problem, but with much more team play.
Week 10
STAR legacy...glorious. It says it right in the name..."R" - Reflections. This in depth spiral of the material, not just in one glance, but rather, a systematic uncovering of more and more material, much like an archeological dig. This allows for deeper understanding of the material. In this way, like Anchored Instruction...deeper, not wider. Seems to take longer in its approach of uncovering the truths that lie just beneath the surface.
I loved the idea of allowing the kids to Leave a legacy. They take with them (on CD or whatever) their own work and then are allowed to help future others in the solving/exploration of the same. What Schwartz et al. stated was to go public with the knowledge thus allowing the thinking visible. The kids see their work, not just on a sheet of paper, but standing the test of time for future students to use.
Week 11 MOST
Targets At Risk Learners. Again, like Jasper/Anchored Instruction, STAR Legacy, GBS, pre-learning still isn't basis, rather, given a scenario in context (really the key to all of them) and allows for students decode along the way. Like STAR, the idea of reflection (though MOST interprets this as retelling of the story) remains strong. I do like the research as it stated from the camtasia intro, retelling works if only to a puppet. The expression (much like STAR again) out there, not only internally, allows for the students to embrace the knowledge and through speaking, clarify what they know.
The verdict
All of these revolve around the lack of push for the pre-learning. There almost seems a transition from the GBS to MOST as to the amount of pre-learning allowed for...at least in my mind. I think these strategies to be full of promise. As it explicitly states, MOST is for those students who are truly at risk. If this is your class, this would be a great strategy to research and implement...though I feel for a younger crowd. As written though through Bransford, seems s bit hard to build one out.
I love the idea of STAR Legacy crossed with GBS sprinkled with Anchored Instruction. Though by accident, I have implemented a version of this in my Sports and entertainment class when it comes to event planning. With almost everyone having experienced an event one time in their lives, given this as a starting point (GBS), one can begin the journey backwards as to the beginnings of what is required to put one on. This is a long process through the event prep minutia (STAR/Anchored Instruction). I can see this on a larger scale, but it will take proper planning and guides to implement this fully.
My Sports and Entertainment class is more of a hands on, and in being so, allows for this unit's usage. As for my Marketing, Marketing Management and Honors Strategic, these methods could be used, but I need more time to decide how and to what extent. Branding, being a major component of each of these classes may be a hard sell in an anchored instruction form.
I remember seeing a storybook program through one of the social studies grades the boys were in...mystorybook. Though I only saw one example, it sounds like the retelling aspect of MOST. Xtranormal (as given by another colleague in this class in previous weeks projects) would allow for storyboarding and retelling as well, and maybe even the initial challenge (STAR) or GBS goal. Easy to use and not a lecture teacher.
Murphy
Thanks for that analogy with the Choose your Adventure storybooks. That's exactly what it reminded me of, too! And who doesn't enjoy those! :)
ReplyDeleteAnd certainly the Jasper series are iconic. Younger generations may not realize that, so thanks for bringing that up!
I was also drawn to leaving a legacy for future students, which is something that can be adapted into many approaches, really. I'm a big proponent of learners creating artifacts to help other learners, when that can be possible time/resource-wise. Speaking of, what are some barriers for implementation of these approaches, in your view?
Biljana
Biljana,
DeleteTime and knowledge. No one likes to fail...especially publicly. Just as the students we teach have been taught to regurgitate, what I see now is that most of teaching is pre-fab in its approach. Since the NCSCOS came into being, yes it did bring everyone of lower note into the fold of current teaching, practices, materials, learning objectives, but it has all but killed creativity in the classroom concerning newer, burgeoning teachers. The learning curve to adequately teach the current slate of classes is steep.
Barriers: time and knowledge, fear of failure...putting it out there and not being sure of the outcome. We are creatures of habit, comfortable in the norm. The most radical of us all (teachers) simply interpret the norm in a slightly different way and act upon that notion. Creativity and perfection take time. I cannot tell you how these end of the unit projects have moved me outside of my comfort zone. My teaching is very personal to me and though I willingly share it with the students I teach, this idea of developing a lesson in such a new format for such an audience as this...different.
But we must be different. We must change. We must invest in the material such that it can better impact the lives of students.
Keith Murphy
Well, I hope this course has provided some help with the knowledge aspect of it, at least, and hopefully the projects you are creating as capstones for each unit are helpful in your practice and are a useful investment of your time! :)
DeleteBiljana
Murphy,
ReplyDeleteI like the idea that you were able to mix the two models to create a learning scenario that worked so well for you. That is not something I would have thought of, but will start considering for the future.
I also agree that it could take time and much thought to create learning based on these models for certain types of content and learners. The effort and time invovled on both the teacher's and students' parts really emphasize how important it is to think it through first.
Lyn